Newborn Frenulum Cutting Lacks Scientific Support
P
Peter Attia MD and Marty Makary's YouTube discussion
Story of claim
Marty Makary argues that frenulum cutting in newborns is widespread despite lacking scientific evidence, calling for randomized control trials to assess its benefits.
- Goal: Promote evidence-based practices in newborn care.
- Proof: Current practices are based on anecdotal evidence rather than scientific research, necessitating rigorous trials.
- Nuances:
- Driven by dental and lactation consultants without evidence.
- Needs randomized control trials to validate claims.
- Impact on Life: Parents may be making uninformed decisions, affecting newborn health without evidence-backed benefits.
Investments
- Price:
- Time:
- Effort:
Risks
Potentially unnecessary procedures impacting newborn health.
Alternatives
- Wait for evidence from controlled trials
- Consult with multiple health professionals before proceeding
Get Started 🚀
- Consult with healthcare providers about the necessity of frenulum cutting.
- Advocate for evidence-based practices in newborn care.
Brogevity AI can make mistakes. Check important info.